The Differences in Concept Between Botox and Dysport

The symptoms of aging cannot be the same for all. Accordingly, it shows up differently in everyone. You may have observed that your wrinkles can only be visible under specific lighting or at a particular angle. It may be that you have seen your frown lines in photos, or possibly the lines around your eyes are more noticeable in the rearview mirror.  

We all face the challenge of getting wrinkles sometime or the other. Time and tide wait for no one. Accordingly, we can’t reverse the aging process. However, injectables play a significant role during skincare treatment in California to help you regain a more youthful look. Most reputed clinics offer injectables to smoothen undesirable fine lines and wrinkles.  

Botox happens to be the most popular injectable. Nevertheless, it isn’t the only one. Dysport® has also been gaining popularity for its amazing results in rectifying frown lines. In this article, we have explained the similarities and differences between the two so you can decide which suits you more. 

Similarity in Nature 

Botox and Dysport are very similar treatments for skin care in Los Angeles. Both are derived from botulinum toxin, which is a neurotoxic protein that is safe if applied in meager quantity. Although you may utilize both Botox and Dysport to improve various medical conditions, their most common utilization is for diminishing wrinkles. It's widely considered that both the injectables are noninvasive and executed by momentarily comforting facial muscles. This stops the muscles from contracting and subsequently smoothens the appearance of wrinkles. The differences between the two are based on their trace proteins and the ways they’re produced. 

How Are They Different? 

One of the fundamental differences between Dysport and Botox is the areas in which they can be used. Dysport is mostly used to rectify glabellar lines, the frown lines between your eyebrows. It is an amazing option for those with moderate to acute frown lines.  

On the contrary, Botox can be utilized to cure various types of wrinkles, including forehead wrinkles, crow’s feet, and laugh lines. When you have mild to moderate wrinkles, Botox could be a better option for you. 

A few people have experienced faster results with Dysport. They could observe a significant reduction in wrinkles within 2-3 days only. The results of Botox usually take around a week to be felt. However, both injectables reveal their optimum results at around 2 weeks. While looking at how long the results last, both Dysport and Botox last approximately 3-4 months. 

One unit of Botox has almost thrice the potency of a unit of Dysport. This doesn’t signify that Botox works better. Instead, more Dysport is required to accomplish the same outcome. As a balancing factor, the cost of a Dysport unit is less compared to that of a Botox unit. So, you’ll end up spending almost the same amount of money for similar results. 

Results Differ 

The biological makeup of every individual is different. As with multiple products and services, results differ from person to person. If you’ve already tried Botox in a skincare clinic in California and wish to attempt something new, Dysport is an amazing option to provide faster results. Consult with an expert team to discuss your skin-care goals and decide which is a better option for you.